The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 22:27, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Chesterfield Quarterback League[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am not sure if this article meets notability. It seems that there are no sources (besides a dead link) for this youth league, though there are a few NFL players that started out from this league. Natg 19 (talk) 09:50, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 November 26. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 09:52, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Courcelles 15:13, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Courcelles 15:13, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. Courcelles 15:14, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:28, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I've never found a youth leauge to be notable and I see no reason that this one should be. I cannot find any notability measure that would make it so. There is some coverage found online, but it is all local coverage. It doesn't matter if any notable players started in the league because all notable players started someplace. If there was widespread coverage about this particular league, it would be different. I just don't see it.--Paul McDonald (talk) 21:56, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 23:36, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG Secret ^account 14:20, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.