The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. KTC (talk) 08:12, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Chowk Kumharanwala Level II Flyover

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A bit of coverage on cost and whatnot is to be expected for a structure like this, but that doesn't make this flyover pass the GNG. The same goes for the others in this city that have articles written on them--they are routine structures, some with routine coverage and some with nothing at all. Also nominated:

Drmies (talk) 02:39, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per nom. The "coverage on cost and whatnot" happens to be very in-depth and easily demonstrates passing WP:GNG. Just because projects of this scale (approximately $40 billion) is "expected" to get coverage, doesn't invalidate that coverage. As a matter of fact, it's ever the more reason for it's demonstration of notability. --Oakshade (talk) 00:34, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:53, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:29, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.