The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete—there is clear consensus rooted in relevant policies and procedures. —Deckiller (t-c-l) 02:26, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Dalton[edit]

Chris Dalton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparent conflict of interest - created by a user named after his company and subsequent edits from the company - one claim to WP:notability but nothing other than a regional business award. Few google hits. Not notable. Most references are not WP:reliable sources noq (talk) 00:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per nominator. Edward321 (talk) 03:13, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. There are seach results, but they're mainly PR releases or trivial mentions. The article does not meet the criteria at WP:BIO.--hkr Laozi speak 06:46, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:48, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete. No evidence of notability. ScottyBerg (talk) 19:24, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.