The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 10:31, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
PROD contested by CazzaR19 (talk·contribs) with no explanation. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. I am also nominating the following related pages because of the same reason:
Delete Can find no evidence of Chris Emms playing a professional game for Middlesbrough, the other 2 should also be deleted for same reason, never being professional.Seasider91 (talk) 12:29, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per nom, no evidence of notability. – Kosm1fent 16:12, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all - none of them have played in a fully pro league, and none of them have received significant coverage. As such, they all fail WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:34, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per nom, non-professionals. Bretonbanquet (talk) 00:05, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per nom - non notables Zanoni (talk) 19:02, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all - Neither have played a match for any fully professional teams and fails WP:NFOOTBALL. All three articles fails WP:GNG, as the only source in the article is the players profiles at the club's website. Mentoz86 (talk) 17:55, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all - haven't played in a pro league and not enough significant coverage, fail WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 21:42, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.