The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. $Salvio giuliano$ 22:37, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Haver[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. As the nominator said: no real SIGCOV notability in regional/national RS; all RS due to his business activities (and not him). UtherSRG (talk) 22:48, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. UtherSRG (talk) 22:48, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A WP:UPE blp (i.e. large article created in one single edit, with photo, and then the editor abandoned WP), that was very PROMO. I trimmed much of the puffery but I left the "America's Cup" section intact for comparison of how PROMO it was. I realized that all his refs are either local Arizona refs (in the AZCentral site), or are related to his business activities (i.e. America's Cup projects). I could not find a regional/national US quality RS that did a SIGCOV piece on him (i.e. he is not a notable figure in the regional/national US business community). Even the local Arizona RS is reporting about his business/investment-activities (he is a wealthy private equity investor), but never about him as a notable subject. It was PROD'ded but an IP (the UPE) asked for it to be refunded, but the refunding Admin immediately sent it to AfD. 78.18.228.191 (talk) 01:38, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect that when you have looked at the recent edits of 98.171.86.98 (talk · contribs) on this BLP (covering his 40th and 50th birthdays), there is going to be some WP:SALTing needed as well. 78.18.228.191 (talk) 02:06, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Feels promotional, puffy wording, sourcing is tangential, mentioning him in relation to other things, no sources about him directly. Oaktree b (talk) 02:13, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article seems to be about a guy that climbed a mountain and sails. Business man does fancy stuff I guess. Oaktree b (talk) 02:14, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Very promotional. Definitely zero notability in climbing world. 31.187.2.233 (talk) 17:07, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The earlier versions are extraordinarily promotional. I have a feeling we will see his BLP at AfD several times in the future (but deleted every time). 31.187.2.233 (talk) 17:14, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:15, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - obvious UPE/COI editing with huge promotional overtones, even with all the work some editors have put in to trimming it down. Does not meet WP:GNG.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:28, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 23:54, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I feel like I must repeat myself: first, substantively, he's just not notable; business executives are dime a dozen. Secondly, I am strongly opposed to paid biographies of marginally notable persons on Wikipedia. In 2007, that could have been excused, but in 2022, it's untenable to try to sneak in a social media page masquerading as an encyclopedia article. To be blunt, it's theft of our services. Salt, burn, TNT, ban, etc. Bearian (talk) 15:08, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.