The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr 13 06:00, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Rombola[edit]

The article was kept because the previous nominator was a sock of JB196 so it was ruled as “Speedily deleted as a Keep (with no prejudice against renomination”. I renominate it because signing a developmental contract with the WWE and working on OVW is in itself not enough to achieve “notability” – also badly fails WP:N and WP:V MPJ-DK 12:44, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete - I agree with MPJ-DK that holding a contract with WWE or OVW does not make someone notable. Most developmental guys don't ever see the light of day and are released as quickly as they were signed. Most of these people have never been heard of either. The article itself is a stub, and I believe that the article should stay ONLY if it can be proved that this guy is indeed notable aside from him just being given a developmental. The article should probably be put on the backburner to see if he does anything in the future, but for now... Delete! Hellswasteland 13:27, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom. The article can easily be recreated if he ever does become notable. Nikki311 22:46, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As currently fails WP:BIO. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 22:52, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 09:54, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:BIO - G 1 ggy ^Talk/_Contribs 22:41, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.