- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. North America1000 17:10, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Chris Whaley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable wrestler. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 05:02, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep, has been the subject of quite some independent coverage in various reliable sources, not so much for his professional wrestling career but, for example, for the film. Given the era, additional print sources may exist. Huon (talk) 20:56, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:29, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 22:43, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 22:43, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Americas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 22:44, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Notable more for the movie than for the wrestling, but notable nonetheless due to in-depth coverage in multiple reliable sources. GaryColemanFan (talk) 02:58, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep through the book and movie coverage he has enough coverage for notability. MPJ-DK 14:21, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Meets GNG requirements.LM2000 (talk) 19:02, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - meets WP:GNG. Nikki♥311 21:03, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:59, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.