The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to LendInvest. Sam Walton (talk) 19:49, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Faes[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Speedy deletion template previously removed. Subject does not meet relevant notability criteria. Article created by single-purpose account for promotional purposes, as was the article for his company, LendInvest. Run of the mill WP:ARTSPAM masquerading as encyclopedia articles. Undisclosed COI editing is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not. The tone of the article reflects its promotional intent. Citobun (talk) 11:05, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect to LendInvest; not independently notable, and article is irredeemably promotional. —Swpb^talk 13:54, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect to LendInvest: more than half of the article is about the company, so a redirect there probably wouldn't hurt. His name does get mentioned in some news sources, but it is in relation to the company or the industry he is in. I couldn't find anything biographical. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 02:16, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.