The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A strange one, to be actually kind of close to notable in several different fields. Between this discussion and the previous, though, it seems she's just not there yet per our standards for inclusion. No bias against recreation if better resources that focus on her directly and in depth as her career(s) grow. Keeper | 76 03:16, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Christina Lindley

[edit]
Christina Lindley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm renominating this article as the first debate (in which I voted) ended with a no consensus and only four votes almost two months ago. I think I'm still going to stand by my first vote as it doesn't seem she has gained much attention since then. However, if other users feel this article should be kept, I'm happy to withdraw. I found a recent press release here that says she joined Phil Ivey's (who is notable) team and she has received attention for being part of his team here and two non-English links here (seems to talk about her a bit but nothing that seems notable) and here (minor mention). She has also received coverage in Card Player magazine here, here, here, here, here, here in the past month and a French article here. The cardplayer.com coverage seems to be quite a bit, with one article even calling her "notable", but it's only for participating in tournaments and not winning any notable awards or achievements. Several of the "keep" votes in the first debate were because she has posed in several notable magazines but I argued that there hadn't been substantial coverage about this. She is not notable as a model or an actress but she may have potential poker notability in the future. Wikipedia:Notability (poker players) and Wikipedia:WikiProject_Poker#Biography_article_notability_criteria say a player is notable if they have won a major poker competition, been inducted into the Poker Hall of Fame or have won $1M in a single event and played at Legends of Poker but did not win and was sponsored to play at the World Series of Poker but did not win either. In the previous nomination, I also mentioned that I found this (probably not reliable) that mentioned she was the first woman to win a "WSOP main event" but there wasn't any other evidence to support this. I hope this second renomination can provide a better consensus perhaps from poker experts. SwisterTwister talk 20:01, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:01, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:02, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:02, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nothing notable about her. For the movie she acted in she is not listed in our cast list, so does not appear to have had a notable role.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:03, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.