- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was snow close. At the very best this is a neologism and there is absolutely zero coverage of this term anywhere but a blog entry someone made up one day. This may or may not have been done to promote the term via Wikipedia, but either way this just isn't notable enough for Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:20, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Christoapokalypsisperihopreteriteprotocenturiaworldjewryology[edit]
- Christoapokalypsisperihopreteriteprotocenturiaworldjewryology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A word one blogger made up today isn't a proper topic for a Wikipedia article. Fails WP:N. —Largo Plazo (talk) 18:53, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. —Largo Plazo (talk) 18:59, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. —Largo Plazo (talk) 19:00, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- What kills me is the limitation on the applicability of A11 to things made up by the author or someone he knows personally. —Largo Plazo (talk) 19:11, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Term 'Christoapokalypsisperihopreteriteprotocenturiaworldjewryology' published at The Fulfilled Connection Magazine[1] Transformium (talk) 19:04, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.