The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 08:08, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ciara Wilson[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Up and coming actress. Was deleted by WP:PROD and restored by request at WP:REFUND. Original reason for deletion was "article was written by now banned editor with undeclared COI. More concerning though is that the article subject does not meet WP:NACTOR – at best, we have one possibly "significant role" on a sketch comedy TV series for a now defunct "mobile" TV channel. Other appearances are not "significant", and mostly consist of guest roles. At best, WP:TOOSOON." ~Anachronist (talk) 03:25, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – I WP:PRODed the article originally, and it was deleted for good reason: the subject does not meet WP:NACTOR. And, despite what was claimed at WP:REFUND, a co-starring role in a forthcoming TV movie will not get subject past that point. I find undeleting it just to take it to WP:AfD to be WP:BURO-y, but whatever – it should still be deleted as WP:TOOSOON, until such time as notability can be demonstrated. (Sidenote: The article was originally created by a now-banned editor with a WP:COI, and there is every reason to believe that the IP who requested the article's undeletion has the same issue...) --IJBall (contribs • talk) 03:32, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
FYI, undeletion from a prod is functionally identical to someone removing the prod tag before it was deleted... in which case it would have ended up at AFD anyway. It should have gone there first. Prods just don't have the same permanence. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:25, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 July 28. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:50, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NACTOR now. WP:TOOSOON. Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:07, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no claim to notability per WP:NACTOR, doesn't meet WP:ANYBIO. --bonadea contributions talk 06:43, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:41, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:41, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Obviously fails the WP:GNG and the WP:NACTOR. WP:TOOSOON -- LACaliNYC ✉ 21:17, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete articles on minors require significant, indepth sourcing. This is lacking for Wilson.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:07, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:TOOSOON, and a perfect example of why PRODs are stupid. Because anyone can just request undeletion of clearly non-notable articles. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:16, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.