The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 22:49, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cicero da Silva[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prod tag removed without comment. Subject fails notability guidelines at WP:ACADEMIC. Ifnord (talk) 15:57, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:24, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. ^{cinco de}L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 17:54, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This looks like part of an effort by a paid editor to create a number of promotional Cv-style articles. 2Joules (talk) 06:13, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Promotionally written, with no evidence of passing WP:PROF. Note that his Google scholar profile is unusable as it is mostly filled with publications by people that are not him. The superficially best-looking source in the article, the Fox News one, also does not mention the subject, so is no help towards WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:04, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.