The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  06:16, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cinco de Moustache[edit]

Cinco de Moustache (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article had several non-existent links or blogs used as sources. I can't see evidence of notability ([1]) but would be happy to change my mind if disproven. Seems to be some non-notable student high jinx... WP:MADEUP comes to mind. --Dweller (talk) 20:04, 8 May 2012 (UTC) Dweller (talk) 20:04, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:09, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You think it's worthy of a redirect? --Dweller (talk) 16:20, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Possibly merge to Strange but Untrue?TheLongTone (talk) 11:36, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Personally, I'm not disputing if it exists, but if it is notable and therefore suitable for Wikipedia. --Dweller (talk) 08:38, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.