This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was merge and redirect. ugen64 21:58, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This fictional character receives 108 unique hits on google. [1] Is it a safe assumption that since it is science-fiction related it should be kept? What if this article covered a non sci-fi topic, would the same rules apply? Please discuss. --GRider\^talk 21:24, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Keep with reservations. Article needs cleanup and expansion. Megan1967 07:06, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and Redirect to The Ewok Adventure. DaveTheRed 07:11, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Concur with Dave. Merge. It's not because it's scifi-related, but Star Wars enjoys a huge amount of fame, thus a minor character from Star Wars could be more important than a major character from a book (sci fi or no) that few people have heard of. Radiant! 09:44, Mar 8, 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to the appropriate subsection of Minor characters in Star Wars. -R. fiend 18:45, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect per R. fiend. Rossami (talk) 21:57, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Merge. We've been doing this for all the Ewoks characters, right?-LtNOWIS 02:00, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. She's the main character of two Star Wars films that have just been rereleased onto DVD for the public, she's not exactly a background character. Obviously the article could use expansion, but I don't see an issue other than that.--Sherurcij 07:09, Mar 13, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.