The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. However, it is now 2 days past the announced release date so it might be prudent to check and see if it's been released before renominating. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:51, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cinemetropolis[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is about an unreleased album (releasing on June 14, 2011). No independent sources are provided (nor can I find any non-blog independent sources) for the album. As such, article fails WP:MUSIC. Article should be userfied until after it is released, but only recreated if notability can then be established through multiple, independent reviews in RS. Qwyrxian (talk) 03:55, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I added a more reliable source for the release date (from the group's own website). The album is definitely notable as it's the third full-length album from a long-running and influential group. It is also definitely currently available, as I have a legit digital copy myself. Unless I'm mistaken, an album being unreleased is not reason enough for deletion. Reviews will come out as the official release date approaches. tdogg241^TC 20:14, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If the album has been released (even digitially), then you need to show that the album meets WP:MUSIC. So far, none of the information from the article is from reliable, third party sources, thus there is no indication that this album is notable. Qwyrxian (talk) 00:00, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - According to WP: NALBUMS: "In a few special cases, an unreleased album may qualify for an advance article if there is sufficient verifiable and properly referenced information about it—for example, Guns 'n Roses' 2008 album Chinese Democracy had an article as early as 2004. However, this only applies to a very small number of exceptionally high-profile projects..."[emphases theirs] I see no indication that Cinemetropolis fits into this narrow category of "exceptionally high-profile projects". As already mentioned, there seems to be no information on the album from third party sources at all.--Martin IIIa (talk) 02:50, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:54, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 00:49, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.