The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 22:09, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cirrus Airlines flight 1569[edit]

Cirrus Airlines flight 1569 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Plane overshoots runway, suffers some damage, no deaths or injuries = encyclopedic article? No; fails WP:N. Biruitorul (talk) 04:01, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Non-notable. It also fails WP:N.--RyRy5 ^{Got something to say?} 07:12, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per WP:AIRCRASH.  Esradekan Gibb  ^"Talk" 07:37, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Google finds nothing; Mannheim City Airport#Incidents lists it as having just happened; it simply didn't generate media coverage. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 08:50, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - non-notable, doesn't even qualify as an incident never mind an accident. Canterbury Tail talk 15:48, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - adequately covered under Cirrus Airlines article, fails WP:AIRCRASH notability guidelines. Mjroots (talk) 16:31, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment When this is closed, the link at Mannheim City Airport#Incidents should be changed to link to Cirrus Airlines#Accidents. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 18:00, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Not encyclopedic. KleenupKrew (talk) 22:37, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.