The result was Delete. Consensus is clear that this is a probable hoax and would be non-notable in any case. In addition to the other evidence of a hoax, note that this article is the creator's only contribution, which in the case of a suspected hoax is always a major red flag. Closing early per WP:SNOW and because the probable hoax is already propagating across the Internet. Newyorkbrad (talk) 22:46, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
No idea why this was accepted like this at AfC by User:Legacypac. First source doesn't mention subject, third and fourth source are about an obviously different Konadu, which leaves us with a report of a U-17 match, which, surprise, doesn't mention this person either.
Worse, Clancy Osei Konadu seems to missing from all reliable sources, and even from all non user-generated sources [1], which gives the strong impression that this is a hoax. At the very best, this is an utterly non notable player who completely fails WP:NSPORTS, with sources in the article which don't meet WP:V for the subject, and no other sources about him available. Fram (talk) 09:46, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
If this fails WP:FOOTY delete the page but if it meets that standard (which it seems to) keep. FOOTY is a stupid notability threshhold that opperates as a bright line. Normal notability standards like NSPORTS don't apply. The best way to sort out FOOTY, which covers a confusing sport with tons of levels of play, is to expose the page to subject matter experts who tag and assess these pages quite quickly. See my comments on the talkpage. Also, I urge you to stop stalking my edits because that is harassment and sanctionable. Legacypac (talk) 09:57, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
I read the nom. Keep or delete is based on the existence of sources and notability guidelines. If you can prove the page is a hoax, than prove it. If it was an obvious hoax it would have been speedied as such. Legacypac (talk) 10:24, 6 November 2018 (UTC)