The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus defaulting to Keep and w/o prejudice to a speedy renomination. This is a mess. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:18, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Claremont-Mudd-Scripps Stags[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete Multiple pages.

spatms (talk) 21:36, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - This page was created without the ((afd2)) template and never transcluded to a daily log. Fixed now. Should properly be procedurally closed, as no rationale has been given for deletion, but could possibly be linked to the related AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claremont-Mudd-Scripps Stags and Athenas, for which the early !votes have been for deletion. Nominator also created a similarly malformed nomination at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claremont-Mudd-Scripps Athenas. @Spatms: For future nominations, please fully follow the procedures at WP:AFDHOWTO. --Finngall ^talk 02:31, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Claremont Colleges#Athletics. I believe the rationale is unnecessary duplication of content ("Multiple pages", above). James (^talk/_contribs) 11:12, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 03:00, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:01, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep / procedural close, as there is no reason given for deletion. However it would not be controversial for anyone to merge/redirect to the main article about the joint sports program of the four related colleges, without any AFD. The supposition that the reason is duplication of content seems false to me because one of the related AFDs is trying to delete the one necessary combo article about the joint sports teams, which would then require complete duplication of all the info into four separate college articles. Keep the one needed main joint article. --doncram 04:41, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- To be clear, Claremont Colleges is about the consortium of colleges partially represented by this sports team, not one of the colleges. There are three colleges represented, not four. As Claremont Colleges is the "main joint article", it would be appropriate to redirect this non-notable page there. James (^talk/_contribs) 15:21, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.