The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was KEEP. postdlf (talk) 02:35, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod - Article unreferenced by non-reliable, third-party sources about a non-notable singer that fails WP:MUSICBIO. Aspects (talk) 23:46, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep. Here's a USA Today article documenting that the subject is a member, if not the leader, of a Grammy-winning vocal group.[1] The group's article reports 8 Grammy wins and 20-or-so nominations, so there's no quibbling over notability. The question of whether to merge this into the group article or keep it split isn't a matter for AFD, and should wait until some folks who know something about gospel music take a crack at fixing the article, which is clearly not exemplary. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 01:42, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Notability is not inherited, see WP:NOTINHERITED. Being a member of a notable group does not make each of the members themselves notable. Aspects (talk) 02:04, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Has been noticed by the African American encyclopedia and Encyclopedia of contemporary Christian music. We should do no less. Colonel Warden (talk) 06:24, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep CW's sources are substantial and sufficient. --joe deckertalk to me 20:49, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.