The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete votes. (non-admin closure) • Gene93k (talk) 22:11, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanser[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NCORP Anupmehra -Let's talk! 19:02, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The article is fairly ghastly, is essentially unreferenced, has the wrong title (it should almost certainly be facial cleanser or skin cleanser, which is currently a redirect to here) and, despite attempts by editors over the years, still reads as if it comes from a commercially-published guide to skin care. But I just don't see how it falls under the nominator's rationale for deletion. The article is about a general, almost certainly notable, class of products, manufactured by a variety of companies, and it does not narrow itself down (or even mention) any specific product or those produced by particular companies. The article could certainly do with being completely rewritten into something more like the one on lipstick, but that's a matter of editing? PWilkinson (talk) 23:21, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NCORP is valid for companies, organizations and any of its products and services (please visit the page for the verification purpose). And let me admit, I mis-understood Cleanser, perhaps. It is not a product of a particular company, for I brought it to AfD. It is a general product manufactured by a number of companies. I understood Cleanser product, a self-titled brand name. As, Cleanser is a product you can use to dash dash dash..., Many people use a cleanser once or more times a day.., Using a cleanser to remove dirt is considered to be a better alternative to bar soap.. and many similar phrases interprets promotional tone. Well, I was just wrong considering a product under self-titled brand name using Wikipedia as WP:Advertisement with no sign of significance. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 23:44, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by the nominator: I withdraw my nomination. I mis-understood Cleanser as a brand name. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 23:45, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.