The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 21:22, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clockify[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable software/app with no evidence of coverage other than insider/trade source. Written as a promotion by an editor with a clear WP:COI. May simply be WP:TOOSOON? Nick Moyes (talk) 14:35, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

When googleing time tracking this software appears to come on the first page. Also, if you lookup it's name, there is quite a number of publications and discussions covering it. I vote stay given it's relevance. Not every product needs paid news advertising. Nicecream (talk) 21:48, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 12:36, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the sourcing consists of a number of blog posts, advertorials and other PR activities, none of which establishes notability. While the topic seems to get some attention, the coverage in reliable and independent sources is still lacking. I agree with the nominator's assessment: this seems WP:TOOSOON. Note: the original article creator now disclosed their connection to the topic at their user page (thank you). GermanJoe (talk) 23:48, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.