The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:23, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Club Asturias de Puebla[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A defunct amateur club. Does not pass either wp:gng or WP:NFOOTY. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:36, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:36, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:37, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 22:40, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 13:25, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:FOOTYN, no indication the club has played in a national competition, no indication of any other achievements garnering sufficient significant, independent coverage to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 11:08, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.