The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:13, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Coey Turipa[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was tagged as Unref-BLP, but now a reference has been added. Still an article of non-notable footballer. Fails notability criteria for footballers per NSPORTS as amateur and only age group international. Coverage is general sports journalism of general nature of type expected for general local sports persons. ClubOranje^T 09:00, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. —ClubOranje^T 09:05, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ClubOranje^T 09:05, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:46, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete Fails the General Notability Guideline. As an aside, while the article meets the letter of the BLP sourcing requirements, a link to a stat page does not, in my opinion, meet the spirit. --W F C-- 21:32, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Changing from delete to weak delete to reflect the fact that work has been done, i.e. adding and sourcing the fact that he has played for New Zealand at youth level. Staying in delete because that alone doesn't confer notability, and the sourcing is still just a bunch of stats. --W F C-- 20:10, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I agree to a degree, but there is no requirement for a reference to prove notability, only verifiability.--ClubOranje^T 00:51, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. Giant Snowman 18:29, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:43, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.