The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was procedural close. The nominator has been indefinitely blocked (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KiwiMan) and no !votes for deletion are otherwise present, so procedurally closing at this time. No prejudice against re-nomination for deletion by a user in good standing. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:00, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Colin Mathura-Jeffree[edit]

Colin Mathura-Jeffree (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A complete and utter promotion of an article. No reliable sources. All puff. KiwiMan (talk) 01:10, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:01, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:01, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:01, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:01, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that the nominator's account has been reported to SPI. Schwede66 17:41, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep and improve obvious bad-faith nomination by blocked sockpuppet, already passes WP:BASIC and plenty of WP:RS for him in GNews. Wikishovel (talk) 00:10, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep easily meets WP:GNG NealeFamily (talk) 01:50, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.