- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ✗plicit 00:03, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comandante (book) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Articles fails WP:BOOKCRIT. The page is only based in reviews, from which the second one (Foreign Policy) is a passing mention and the last one (BBC) is a primary source. NoonIcarus (talk) 19:17, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature, Politics, and Venezuela. NoonIcarus (talk) 19:18, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The cited reviews in The Independent [1] and Literary Review [2] seem pretty substantive. Noting that the book has multiple editions, it has also been reviewed in The New York Times [3], The Washington Post [4], The Telegraph [5], Financial Times [6], The Economist [7], Publishers Weekly [8], Kirkus Reviews [9], Booklist [10], and more. Seems like a relatively straightforward WP:GNG / WP:NBOOK pass to me. DanCherek (talk) 20:13, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Um, either DanCherek did an awesome job or there was some sort of BEFORE failure here. Jclemens (talk) 20:20, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Passes NBOOK. SNOW close. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 14:32, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.