The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete, obvious advertising for a promotional business that contained no minimal showing of importance: a New York based management agency representing hair stylists, colorists, makeup artists, fashion stylists and photographers. Proposed deletion was contested by User:NYCCommunity, a handle that suggests conflict of interest. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:26, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Community NYC[edit]

Agency appears to be attempting to use Wikpedia for promotion of its clients. Notabiliy not established. There is not even any text in the article, it is nothing but lists of clients. Most of the links under "References" are not actually references about the agency, but rather blog or other articles about one or another client. Yworo (talk) 21:22, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete Per WP:CSD G11. Jujutacular ^talk_contribs 21:33, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete one way or another per nominator--a speedy would have been and still is appropriate. Drmies (talk) 22:35, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I just nominated the article for speedy deletion under WP:CSD_A7. The article doesn't indicate the importance or significance of the organization. The reference list is a WP:LINKFARM. Google searches show no apparent signs of notability. — Rankiri (talk) 22:43, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I would delete but it is not clear it should be speedy. Bearian (talk) 23:35, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.