The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 17:26, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Conception: Ore no Kodomo wo Undekure![edit]

Conception: Ore no Kodomo wo Undekure! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreleased still in development game,likely not in english, sourced by one non reliable article. Significant copying of content direction from said article (copyvio). This should be a CSD, but I don't think the criteria fit! PRODed and removed by creator. Submitting for AFD. Gaijin42 (talk) 21:18, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 17:06, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk). — frankie (talk) 17:06, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - For what it's worth, both "Famitsu" and "Andria Sang" are deemed reliable sources by Wikiproject Video Games. So there's 2 reliable sources there. Sergecross73 msg me 17:27, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - In addition to the 2 reliable sources used already, I found 2 more relatively quickly. Coverage from Siliconera here and Gamespot here. It should be rewritten to avoid the copyright issues, definitely, but it can be re-written with these reliable sources. (Which I may attempt to do...) Sergecross73 msg me 21:45, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as per current sources + Serge's ones. Articles needs clean-up to remove copyvio but not deletion. Salvidrim (talk) 22:30, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Notable game - found 5 RS - Ret.Prof (talk) 21:49, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.