The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:12, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Concord-Painesville, Ohio[edit]

Concord-Painesville, Ohio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Article is a single-sentence description of a proposed merger of several localities in Lake County, Ohio (near Cleveland), giving no sources except a single local citizens' group website; the website is so small that several aspects mentioned on its front page aren't yet online. Definitely not notable, and there's no article to which this (quite an unlikely target) should be redirected. Nyttend (talk) 03:51, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. No independent sources, only purpose is to promote the cause of consolidation. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 04:03, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Not a real place, but rather a website proposing a merger. Unless this idea gains serious traction, it lacks notability. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:07, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete no GnewsHits. Can be recreated if this comes to fruition. §hep • ¡Talk to me! 22:23, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Seems the creator was not notified. I'll do it. §hep • ¡Talk to me! 22:26, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. §hep • ¡Talk to me! 22:26, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.