The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete.  (aeropagitica)  23:28, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Consumarchy[edit]

Prodded as protologism, based on coinage of one a single researcher. Prod tag removed so bringing it here.

• Delete as per my nom. Dlyons493 Talk 18:29, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete neologism, practically nothing on Google. What do people that write this sort of thing as serious science smoke? Sandstein 19:54, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 17:11, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Neologism, WP is not a dictionary.  (aeropagitica)  18:04, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom Bucketsofg 19:36, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• delete see above Nigelthefish 16:03, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.