The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 03:50, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copeland Family[edit]

Copeland Family (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Article seems to be, or to be promoting, original research with no reliable sources supplied. Can find no reliable references, news or otherwise to the Copeland family in this context TheSmuel (talk) 15:33, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Found no conventional folklore sources for the tale this article wants to tell. May be some kind of attack page or personal aggrandizement in disguise. Sources do exist for haunts at Highgate Cemetery, but that's a highly notable cemetery for other reasons, and any information could just be added to that article. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:59, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I'm with Smerdis of Tlön on this issue. I don't see any reliable sources proving the claims of this article. Apart from that it is written a bit sensationalistically. De728631 (talk) 18:56, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.