The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 01:40, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I couldn't find any significant coverage. The 4 sources semi-cited in the Notes section could potentially be enough for notability, but I couldn't find them anywhere on the internet. If these could be expanded with dates, issue numbers, etc., and ideally URLs so that we could check them out, that would help no end.--Michig (talk) 20:29, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Less puffy now. Stil, Delete for lack of coverage, lack of touring (as far as I can tell), and lack of more than one album. Michig's efforts are great and helpful, BTW, and appreciated, but right now the article just doesn't have enough. Drmies (talk) 16:07, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Unless verifiable sources are found, it's not going to stay.--Michig (talk) 18:26, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:16, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.