The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:43, 30 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Cornwall, Missouri[edit]

Cornwall, Missouri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All indications are that this is/was a non-notable railroad station, not a community. GNIS gives it a census code of U6, which by definition is a populated place without legal recognition as a community, which does not pass WP:GEOLAND. A 1952 book of Missouri place names by Ramsay, which is considered to be one of the better books on the subject for Missouri, calls it a railroad station. State historical society calls it a railroad station. Old book calls it a station. 1910 topo shows not a whole lot there, and it at a point along the railroad. By 1959, there's about six buildings there. A little more there by 2000, but the development is a ways from the site, and seems to be associated with the railroad. Apparently copper deposits there, but since the Cornwall Copper Mine was a thing, that may not actually be about this "populated place". With the census code saying this is not legally recognized as a community, several sources calling this just a railroad station, and nothing refer to this as an actual community, I'd say this likely fails WP:GEOLAND, the WP:GNG failure is a bit clearer. Hog Farm Bacon 18:53, 14 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Bacon 18:53, 14 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Bacon 18:53, 14 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Joe (talk) 17:44, 22 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.