- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:16, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Costas Pilea[edit]
- Costas Pilea (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested on the grounds that he has "played in UEFA". I'm not really sure what this is supposed to mean, but none of his matches to date satisfy WP:NSPORT. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:07, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:07, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:04, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:04, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cyprus-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:05, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, as per the comment below. RileyBugz会話投稿記録 00:39, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
Keep - I think this should be kept because it seems to satisfy WP:NFOOTY, as the player has played in a UEFA match, which seems to fulfill the criterion that they play in a "competitive senior international match". RileyBugz会話投稿記録 22:06, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note the word "senior" in the text you've just quoted. Pilea has only ever played for Cyprus at the youth level, which WP:NFOOTY explicitly excludes: Youth players are not notable unless they satisfy one of the statements above, or if they can be shown to meet the wider requirements of WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:30, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.