The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete.SoothingR 21:23, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Courageism[edit]

Delete. Google only shows 10 hits on this word, making it not suitable for wikipedia, wiktionary or anyplace else. Xyzzyplugh 00:32, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, non-notable neologism. -- Mithent 00:44, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Arbustoo 00:46, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Mithent Avi 01:23, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Mithent. Makemi 01:36, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per all above. Royal Blue 02:12, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as above. Blnguyen 02:36, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Deleteism. Zarquon 02:46, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I didn't know Bush had a Wiki account --† Ðy§ep§ion † ^{Speak your mind} 02:53, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as not sufficiently cromulent. Adrian~enwiki (talk) 02:55, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Bad article 64.194.44.220 03:44, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom.,,,,,Ariele 03:50, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as non-notable neologism. --Kinu 07:14, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Mithent -21:25, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Dyspepsion (hee hee). dbtfz^talk 06:10, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.