The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 07:31, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cov Campus[edit]

Cov Campus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Have searched for sources, I have found no reliable coverage. I believe that it is not notable and WP:TOOSOON. StudiesWorld (talk) 19:47, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. StudiesWorld (talk) 19:47, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. StudiesWorld (talk) 19:47, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Seems to be a clear case of WP:TOOSOON. I was originally was voting for draftify, but then I see that there's no secondary sources that explains the campus at all, which is not good for WP:GNG. INeedSupport ^:3 22:09, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not enough substance to the article. If it can be fleshed out both in terms of content and sources, then can stay. For now, no. MaskedSinger (talk) 18:33, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.