- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 03:13, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Crasharama[edit]
- Crasharama (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Searches with "Crasharama motorsport tour" only found a few expected local passing mentions at Books, News and browsers but certainly not anything to suggest even a minimally better notable article. Notifying taggers Logical Fuzz and Neutrality. SwisterTwister talk 02:53, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 02:53, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 02:53, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:18, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:18, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Actually, the hits on News don't appear to be about the Crasharama in this article, which is about a supposed event series in the US, while those mentions are all for different countries. Nothing on Newspapers or Highbeam, a couple of trivial mentions on books, and shockingly, nothing on Scholar. Clearly fails WP:GNG, and is currently unsourced (except to a link which brings up an unfinished website for something called "Tours of Destruction"). Onel5969 TT me 12:47, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no significant, independent, third-party coverage indicating that event is notable. Neutralitytalk 01:37, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.