The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 21:50, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence of any notability. No independent and reliable sources and thus no evidence of any notability. Pure advertising. Fails WP:GNGVelellaVelella Talk 08:23, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As per the nominator, it's also an awful article. Lee Vilenski(talk • contribs) 10:15, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom, fails WP:GNG. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 15:35, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.