The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Minor fictional character doesn't meet WP:N. Prod declined. — XSG 02:59, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
merge as the default way of handling these. No reason given why that is unsatisfactory. DGG (talk) 08:22, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note - Merge and redirect is the default way of handling notable characters. When the subject is not notable at all, a redirect is inappropriate. Think about it; if every minor character in every fictional work you ever witnessed had a redirect back to the primary source, Wikipedia would be an extraordinarily confusing place full of disambiguation pages. — XSG 01:05, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 02:46, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of♥♦♣ ♠ 00:30, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.