The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 14:30, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Creepypasta[edit]

Creepypasta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Contested prod for a term even the article creator admits is a neologism. Sourcing consists of a news article that does not mention the term and a link to a web forum. Delete as per WP:V unless independent sources provided to establish verifiability. --Allen3 ^talk 18:11, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Wikipedia is not place for silly 4chan's memes. Zero Kitsune (talk) 21:52, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Nothing to suggest this is even slightly notable. -WarthogDemon 21:53, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per above. Blaxthos ( t / c ) 22:51, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep As a topic, Creepypasta forms the basis of an acceptable encyclopedic article. By the way, there is an encyclopic article about 4chan on Wikipedia. --Firefly322 (talk) 00:17, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge While the article in question, due to neologism, isn't appropriate for it's own article, I suggest we merge it with the 4chan article. That way we can keep the information. --Niyou77 (talk) 11:11, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete neologism. Nabla (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.