The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:06, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cristopher Mejia[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about former footballer who made a total of 1 appearance in Trinidad & Tobago's potentially fully-pro TT Pro League (however, per the discussion at WT:FPL, I don't think the sources demonstrate the league is fully-pro). Although this appears to satisfy the bright-line of WP:NFOOTBALL, it does not because there is longstanding consensus that a footballer who played a minimal amount in a fully-pro league but comprehensively fails WP:GNG does not actually satisfy NFOOTBALL (see e.g., Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phakamani Mngadi). All of the online coverage is routine (database entries or transfer announcements). Jogurney (talk) 15:08, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:17, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:17, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Trinidad and Tobago-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 15:42, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 15:43, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Whether he scrapes by NFOOTY (doubtful in this case as nom points out) is immaterial as NFOOTY merely creates a presumption of GNG. Per my assessment and search we don't have anything close to meeting GNG here. Icewhiz (talk) 15:46, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Lacks significant coverage and so it fails the GNG. There is no narrative beyond a couple of brief notes and there appears to be no potential for any worthwhile expansion. No Great Shaker (talk) 19:08, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - one sole appearance many years ago does not make up for the massive GNG failure. Giant Snowman 07:35, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.