The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 19:52, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Croatian Coalition[edit]

Croatian Coalition (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not necessary- links to nonexistent pages Zzaffuto118 (talk) 05:38, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Yes the article has links but doesn't it seem redundant to have a disambiguation page that only links to one other blue link page? That article was in the backlogs from December 11th so it doesn't seem like the author has made any effort to work on those red-links. A disambiguation page with only one working link, after a month of creation, is unnecessary. Zzaffuto118 (talk) 02:43, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The two redlinked articles are unlikely to be created. The one bluelinked article is not really very helpful, and should probably be merged into 2010–2011 Bosnia and Herzegovina government formation, or a similar article. Nevard (talk) 05:54, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.