The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 06:29, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Crowne Plaza Manila Galleria[edit]

Crowne Plaza Manila Galleria (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This hotel is WP:Run-of-the-mill and fails WP:NBUILD. A couple of conferences were held there? Every hotel has conferences....... Wikiwriter700 (talk) 18:17, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:42, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:42, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: per nom. Only historic and/or major hotels such as the Manila Hotel satisfies WP:NBUILD. HiwilmsTalk 08:26, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep It's been less than six months since the last AfD request was closed, and now we're doing another one? This is arguably one of the biggest hotels in the Ortigas Center area, so if we're using a narrow reading of WP:NBUILD that implies only "major hotels" get coverage, then this meets it. In the last AfD the subject was proven to have sufficiently met WP:GNG, and it is still the case this time around. --Sky Harbor ^(talk) 23:11, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: It was agreed to be kept in the previous AfD. Article is good enough to pass WP:GNG with the sources indicated there. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 16:00, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep - has just about enough news coverage for GNG Spiderone 10:27, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The previous AfD was only a few months ago. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:11, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep and close: We need to understand that we cant raise AFD in short duration, it is literally wasting the time and attention of reviewers. Billyshudson (talk) 21:14, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: This is Billyshudson's 7th edit in Wikipedia altogether. Geschichte (talk) 22:13, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.