The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. kurykh 00:56, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Crunkcore[edit]

Crunkcore (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable neologism/"scene", no real references beyond blog sites.

As prod was removed, AFD submitted. Blowdart | ^talk 12:10, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Feel bad for the new editor who has done a good job with this article, and who should definitely stick around, but I had a good look and couldn't find any good sources for this on the web (where they are most likely to be found for this sort of thing). And the two bands listed as crunkcore in the article that themselves have articles here do not seem to identify as crunkcore. Sounds like a truly horrendous idea, btw, so will probably be notable soon. :P 86.44.21.224 (talk) 12:44, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I reviewed all the sources/references given, but none of them can satisfy WP:N. One guardian article describes about what crunk is, but not the band. Others are either a catalogue, a forum, a blog or a user page. For this moment, I'd say delete. Dekisugi (talk) 13:40, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per rigorous investigation by other editors. ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:12, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I searched on Google, and although the word "crunkcore" returns several pages of results, I could not find significant coverage, or reliable sources to verify the definition in the article, so I don't think it meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion (specifically WP:GNG and WP:V). —Snigbrook 22:39, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 00:58, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.