The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:21, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cube Technologies[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see anything to indicate this is a noteworthy company. Its website is down, and the references are either dead or don't mention it. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:23, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:08, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:08, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:CORP. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 05:05, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 13:27, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable with no claim of it, no RS, nothing later than 2010, and the company's site seems defunct. Celtechm (talk) 01:28, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.