The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. JERRY ^talk _contribs 01:44, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CyberEvolution[edit]

Pretty sure this is a non-notable organisation, but it doesn't really fit a speedy, so brought here. BLACKKITE 10:25, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletion discussions. -- -- pb30<talk> 16:48, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no coverage from secondary sources, so it fails WP:CORP and WP:N. Percy Snoodle (talk) 16:51, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someone another 17:01, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable as it stands. I would say it is also borderline advertisement, but could not say if it really is, never having used this service. Slavlin (talk) 01:13, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.