The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 13:34, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cyware labs

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG: no coverage in reliable sources outside of WP:SPIP, the references are press releases and rehashes of press releases. Rentier (talk) 13:22, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 19:26, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 19:26, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no independent sources and smacks of promotion. Wikipedia article, mirror sites and their own self publish site is the only result from search that contain any meaningful detail. –Ammarpad (talk) 06:06, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.