The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete all. Hut 8.5 19:46, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

D. Saarvindran[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by the creator of a previously deleted version the article, without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:25, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following articles for the same reason: Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:25, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:25, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:25, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:25, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per nom, fail WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 15:49, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. Fail WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Argyle 4 Life^talk 19:18, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY. Mentoz86 (talk) 00:48, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all - no evidence that any of these article satisfy our notability guidelines. Jogurney (talk) 14:41, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.