The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. Mailer Diablo 22:42, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DHPOS[edit]

Article seems like an advertisement through and through, does not state notability of software and probably would fail WP:SOFTWARE. Daniel Case 05:17, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Googling returns 2,120 hits ... enough to pass the Google test. I am willing to concede it's notable and withdraw the nomination if the article is properly cleaned up and rewritten to our standards (I would do it myself, but I am not familiar with the software). Daniel Case 13:30, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'll start on that, but I can't finish the job Bobby P. Smith Sr. Jr. 14:12, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Just did what I could Bobby P. Smith Sr. Jr. 14:29, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'd say: kill the exhortation, cut the testimonials down to a briefer explanation of why the creator did the creating, add a bit about what the software is, do some other bits like removing "completely" from "completely free", fix the link to Point of Sale to Point of sale so as to better integrate this thing into wikipedia, and so on. I'll do some of this right now. Bobby P. Smith Sr. Jr. 14:12, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Just did what I could Bobby P. Smith Sr. Jr. 14:29, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.