The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Wizardman 22:35, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DJ Miko[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail the notability guidelines for musicians. Google turns up nothing substantial to verify the claims made in the article. @Kate (parlez) 05:34, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 06:57, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, without any online coverage and no solid evidence of offline coverage, a person can't be notable. Nyttend (talk) 18:39, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. I'm not finding "in-depth" coverage, but here are sources to demonstrate his "What's Up" cover version charted in the UK, U.S., Sweden and New Zealand, which satisfies criterion 2 of WP:MUSICBIO. Gongshow ^Talk 20:03, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Per criterion 2. --Epeefleche (talk) 15:10, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 03:52, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:MUSICBIO Polarpanda (talk) 07:37, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Per Gongshow. Joe Chill (talk) 16:25, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.