The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 23:37, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DJ Tilt[edit]

~~Promotion for Non-notable DJ, references don't support claims in some cases~~OlEnglish ^(Talk) 03:25, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn, please close. OlEnglish ^(Talk) 03:27, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, do you mind explaining what's going on? Baileypalblue (talk) 03:34, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was being careless and jumped to conclusions, the references do support the claims. OlEnglish ^(Talk) 04:08, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MrKIA11 (talk) 00:36, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I asked MrKIA11 to re-list this AfD because I was planning to PROD it before OlEnglish AfD'd it and then withdrew his AfD almost immediately. Non-notable DJ, lacks reliable source coverage to satisfy the general notability guideline or WP:ENTERTAINER. Baileypalblue (talk) 00:43, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Insufficient notability per guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 01:37, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I don't think it meets any of the WP:BAND guidelines. Even the interview by CNBC doesn't quite make it up to #1. §FreeRangeFrog 02:52, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I had problems with some of the references at first but taking a second look the important ones checked out so I withdrew the nom and decided a cleanup would be better. So after CultureDrone's cleanup and tagging I think it's worth keeping. If he's not too notable now, I'm willing to bet he will be in the future. -- OlEnglish ^(Talk) 04:36, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The only valid reference I see there is the "bizbash" one, which aside from probably not being WP:RS, also simply repeats the Google bit, which in and of itself does not suddenly propel this guy to WikiStardom. Of course, no prejudice to creating a page for him once he is notable, but this AfD is intended to decide if he meets the inclusion guidelines now. §FreeRangeFrog 05:12, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral I only cleaned it up to remove the blatant POV/fan type prose in the hope of finding something notable, and imho it's still marginal at best. There are a lot of claims made with little supporting evidence - as FRF mentioned, the only really verifiable claim (at the moment) is the bizbash event and I'm not sure that one event imparts sufficient notability. If the other events claimed could be sourced, he probably would be notable (again imho), but I'm going to let wiser minds chew it over...if minds can chew.... :-) CultureDrone (talk) 11:02, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete even though the nominator withdrew this AFD, but where are the reliable sources. Fails WP:BIO Secret ^account 18:56, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.